🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a flawed view of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" policies represent an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this argument is based on a serious misreading of the reality. The actual danger confronting the EU is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Economic Gap Separating the US and Europe

The data reveal a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this period, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly half of the world’s top fifty technology firms are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Problem

This widening economic gap is driven by superior productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at over ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This gap prompts a pressing question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does the EU stand? Experts widely concede it is largely a contest between two between the US and China, with Europe entering at a clear handicap.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several major factors explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented rules hamper European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population, is split among twenty-seven separate systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

In spite of these hurdles, one can find causes for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to advance serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the need for major changes.

With the right incentives and rule changes, these assets might enable much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains significant strengths: skilled workforce, excellent education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements could unleash a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not become the leader in developing next-generation tech, it can still dramatically increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been steady. However, if it fails to take decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.